Talk:Bylaws
From St. Louis Hackerspace Wiki
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
As Software can't really be used without hardware I feel we shouldn't have them as seperate levels. I do feel two seperate paying levels should be used as not everyone needs/wants full access all the time. Mostly the names bug me. -KholdFuzion | As Software can't really be used without hardware I feel we shouldn't have them as seperate levels. I do feel two seperate paying levels should be used as not everyone needs/wants full access all the time. Mostly the names bug me. -KholdFuzion | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | Just to clarify, KholdFuzion, the "software", "hardware" designations were a simplification described at the steering committee. They aren't actually in the bylaws at the moment and I don't think it is anyone's intention to define them as such. -neXus | ||
Revision as of 04:33, 13 May 2009
Section 3, Article 2, Subsection 1 "Only human persons may apply for or be considered a full member, supporting member, or community member. " is unneeded because it is already in MO law. -- neXus
Good place for a calendar to take a stab at a clear day is here: http://www.sluug.org/resources/calendar/ --neXus
Should we do some sort of looser formula for the full membership? Where we say x hours a month or $n for each hour missed? --neXus
As Software can't really be used without hardware I feel we shouldn't have them as seperate levels. I do feel two seperate paying levels should be used as not everyone needs/wants full access all the time. Mostly the names bug me. -KholdFuzion
Just to clarify, KholdFuzion, the "software", "hardware" designations were a simplification described at the steering committee. They aren't actually in the bylaws at the moment and I don't think it is anyone's intention to define them as such. -neXus
